Some xkcd to start off this post:
I wonder if I am too critical. I shall explain.
I have been enjoying Alpha. The people are very nice, the food is great and I even re-connected with an old friend.
There have been three Alpha sessions so far. Number one "Christianity: Boring, Untrue, Irrelevant?", Number two "What is the Evidence for Christianity?", and Number three "Why did Jesus die?". It's been kind of interesting hearing these teachings with a different mindset. There are so many more problems than I used to let myself see. Belief is pretty powerful stuff, and I believed pretty powerfully. When I think about it, it makes me sad. I do miss it. It almost feels like I am going through the final stages of a separation, except the other person in the relationship might never have existed. I have not yet completely given up on belief, just the more traditional Christian belief, "relationship with Jesus", that I had. If it is something you can lose, I seemed to have misplaced it and picked up some sort of naturalism. The desire to slip back into the more evangelical world view is definitely there. The only thing that stops me is I can't live or preach what I don't really believe. Belief for the sake of belief does not really appeal.
What does this have to do with being too critical? Someone at our table asked to read the notes I had been taking. She made the comment that they seemed to be mostly critical. She was concerned that in criticizing the flaws I saw, I would become bitter. The suggestion was made that I try and write down the positive. She's right, it is too easy to be critical, and I don't want to be bitter. I also don't want to give ideas and beliefs a free ride in my brain. I think the part of it is that there is so much in the Alpha videos that seems contentious to me. I know Mr Gumbel is not trying to, but it seems like he's helping decide what it is that I no longer believe, rather than introduce me to belief. It is also starting to be apparent that Alpha is geared towards Christians, or those with no history in the Christian tradition, not towards the skeptic.
My thoughts are a little all over the place, but I'll end with this. I'll try to write notes in a little more of a positive light. Can a person write critical thoughts of ideas and beliefs without being too critical?
Just to show I'm not too one sided, I am half way through Jesus is Dead by Robert Price. The books seems little all over the place and don't really like his writing style either. Maybe I am too critical. In the words of Megan, "You cynical bastard". I like to think they were said with affection...
Cheers,
Scott
A blog for my thoughts. Opinions of past Scott may not be the opinions of future Scott.
1/28/2010
1/20/2010
The Challenge
I've decided to climb a mountain of literature, hopefully within a year. I might have to squeeze two or three years into this, but we'll see how it goes. Lukeprog at Common Sense Atheism has written a post called the Ultimate Truth Seeker Challenge. Go read the post so you get the general idea, I'll wait.
Now I know this might seem a little silly or pointless, depending on your view of the world and the nature of truth. Some people would probably add, or take away, different books. It's a challenge though, and I want to give it a shot. I don't expect to be any sort of expert when I'm done. I do expect to be able to at least have a better idea of my beliefs, and maybe be a little more eloquent in describing them.
The tricky part is I can't read the books in order. It all depends on the library, ordering, and when things arrive. I don't have the time to blog through each book, but I might at least write an entry after I finish each one. I'll keep a notebook handy as I'm reading too, just so I don't forget everything.
I've made up a list of the books and the status of each. If you're in the Edmonton area and you want to read these too, I have an online library list. You can see which ones they have in stock. If anyone feels like donating any of the books, I would not say no. As well, if anyone wants to read them too, let me know, maybe we could discuss the books together as we go.
Cheers,
Scott
PS - If someone had strong objections to a book, thinking there was a much better one to be put in it's place, I am open to discussion.
PS - If someone had strong objections to a book, thinking there was a much better one to be put in it's place, I am open to discussion.
Library Has in Stock /On Order:
Guy P. Harrison (354 pages, beginner, skeptical)
Peter Kreeft / Ronald K Tracelli (406 pages, beginner, apologetic)
William Lane Craig (416 pages, intermediate, apologetic)
Robert Price (279 pages, intermediate, skeptical)
Greg Boyd & Paul Eddy (480 pages, intermediate, apologetic)
Richard Carrier (444 pages, intermediate, skeptical)
Michael Martin (256 pages, advanced, skeptical)
Richard Swinburne (376 pages, advanced, apologetic)
Library Is Not Ordering; Trying Through Inter-Library Loans Department:
J.P. Moreland & William Lane Craig
J.P. Moreland (288 pages, advanced, apologetic)
Robin Le Poidevin (184, pages, advanced, skeptical)
Gregory Dawes (222 pages, advanced, skeptical)
15 - The Non-existence of God:
Nicholas Everitt (352 pages, advanced, skeptical)
Paul Copan & others
20- Arguing about Gods:
Graham Oppy (472 pages, advanced, skeptical)
William Lane Craig & others (704 pages, advanced, apologetic)
Jordan Howard Sobel (676 pages, advanced, skeptical)
Library Is Trying to Order:
James F. Sennett & others (336 pages, advanced, apologetic)
Michael Martin (541 pages, advanced, skeptical)
Have Asked Library to Order:
J.L. Mackie (278 pages, advanced, skeptical)
Michael J. Murray & others (429 pages, advanced, apologetic)
Paul Copan & others (304 pages, advanced, apologetic)
Can try to order at later date:
Published in April 27, 2010
Already Own:
Alvin Plantiga (528 pages, advanced, apologetic)
1/15/2010
Explore the Matrix
I've been going through my google reader, catching up on whatever interesting blog entries I missed. One that I have been enjoying more and more is James F. McGrath's blog Exporing Our Matrix. It's sometimes academic yet readable, and he posts lots of sci-fi and science stuff, so what's not to like!
This entry from January is a good example of why I like it. His post on Santa and Religion was also very good.
Now for a random xkcd comic.
Cheers.
This entry from January is a good example of why I like it. His post on Santa and Religion was also very good.
Now for a random xkcd comic.
Cheers.
1/13/2010
Alpha Course
A cousin of mine invited me to join him and his wife in the Alpha course. My wife has volleyball on Wednesday nights, so I decided to go. Mainly for kicks and giggles. Tonight's the first night, and depending on how it goes and if I decide to go again, I might write some more about it. My younger brother firmly told me to keep my mouth shut and not to be a shit disturber. With that in mind I'll take my moleskin, try to be quiet, and listen.
On a not incompletely unrelated topic, I just found this website. http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/. I am curious who is behind it, if it was a university or just some random person?
Cheers,
Scott
PS - Just because I like to have pictures in entries, here's a random Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal.
On a not incompletely unrelated topic, I just found this website. http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/. I am curious who is behind it, if it was a university or just some random person?
Cheers,
Scott
PS - Just because I like to have pictures in entries, here's a random Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)